September 10, 2013

Mid-century unwholesomeness: Gossip, celeb, sex scandal magazines

[See here for a list of earlier posts in this series.]

Back in the Fifties, they may not have had the internet or TV recording equipment fancy enough to film reality shows, but that doesn't mean they didn't have just as perverse of an interest in the lurid details of celebrities as we do today. They made do with the state of mass media at the time and pumped out gossip magazines, the most (in)famous one being Confidential.

From a 1955 article in TIME, during the gossip mag's heyday:

In a little more than two years, a 25¢ magazine called Confidential, based on the proposition that millions like to wallow in scurrility, has become the biggest newsstand seller in the U.S. Newsmen have called Confidential ("Tells the Facts and Names the Names") everything from "scrawling on privy walls" to a "sewer sheet of supercharged sex." But with each bimonthly issue, printed on cheap paper and crammed with splashy pictures, Confidential's sale has grown even faster than its journalistic reputation has fallen.

You hear that? The biggest newsstand seller in the country. Not some niche rag that nobody paid attention to. Not to mention all of its imitators.

Folks in cocooning times become starved for gossip, since isolated people won't be getting any in real life. But now that the target is someone unknown to the receiver, someone they could never potentially run into around the community, the receiver will feel none of the natural restraints that keep gossip from getting too lurid or too vicious. It's not like a stranger will be able to fight back. Plus you don't know them, so their feelings wouldn't really count to you anyway. Cocooning breeds a callous and lurid interest in the private lives of others.

These things began to decline already by the end of the '60s, as people got involved in each other's real lives and had something personal to gossip about, though now within the natural constraints of relationships among members of a common group. By the '80s, celeb obsession was at a nadir -- thank God -- though it has since risen again and become as widespread as it had been during the mid-century. TMZ.com, reality TV, bla bla bla.

You can do a Google image search for any of the big mid-century gossip magazines. Just search "hush-hush magazine 1957" or what have you. The gallery below may be a bit overkill, but I want to emphasize how pervasive to culture of lurid voyeurism was back then. All are from the Eisenhower years, yet it's uncanny and depressing how familiar they all feel. (Check the file name for the exact year.) After spending an hour of looking through all the covers, I'm going to need a good '80s cocktail antidote tomorrow. Something uplifting.

'Remember that cute trick you dated? "She" was a he!'

'Now -- Surgery cures frigid wives'
'Why Liberace's theme song should be, "Mad About the Boy!" '

 'Call girl-school teacher tells of her experiences--
"Love Without Men in Women's Prison" '

 'The inside story on HOMOSEXUALS'

 'Special report: Sex in schools!'

 'Love-hungry women!
Sex swindlers'

 'Men in skirts!'

 'Exposed: $300,000,000 pornography racket'

 'Why the nude Folies Bergere star tried to kill herself!'

 'The TV stars filthy letters'

 'Debra Paget: She strips to conquer'

 'Scandal of our massage parlors!'

 'Hollywood's latest pill kick: "Don't-give-a-damn" drugs'
'New massage parlor scandal: They are peddling sex again!'

 'Are Swedish girls oversexed?'

 'The bare facts about the torso trade'

 'Exposed: How wife swapping clubs cheat the law!'

 'A pill a day to keep the stork away'

7 comments:

  1. omg, i worked at a vintage store on south street briefly and we had STACKS of these and "confidential" and "true confessions" and i pored over them--our image of the 50s is certainly distorted.

    i was remarking to my husband the other day that now i can really understand why the silents (abbie hoffman et al)were so disgusted by the 50s and pushed the boomers to rebel and make the world more interesting again, having grown up in the 70s-and 80s i find this era stultifying and corny and bizarrely g rated and x rated at the same time i hope th eautist young people you describe get bored with their own culture and start some shit eventually!

    ReplyDelete
  2. "bizarrely g rated and x rated at the same time"

    Sounds familiar, doesn't it? I haven't waded as deep into Victorian pop culture, but it seems the same way too. Actually we're even more similar to the Victorians than to the mid-century people because of our widening inequality, which makes folks more snarky and anti-socially competitive.

    If you live too g-rated of a life, your brain will still want stimulation, so it goes off in a voyeuristic / vicarious direction instead of approaching / participating. But lurid voyeurism does more to warp the mind and corrupt the soul than smoking the occasional joint, getting into a fight, or making out with someone you just met at a party.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "i can really understand why the silents (abbie hoffman et al)were so disgusted by the 50s and pushed the boomers to rebel and make the world more interesting again"

    that's a good point - that members of the Silent Gen. were leaders of the 60s Counterculture Revolution. don't forget Martin Luther King, all the Beatles and Rolling Stones, too.

    As Agnostic pointed out, members of the Greatest Generation are also responsible for leading the charge against the midcentury repression.

    -Curtis

    ReplyDelete
  4. When I was in college in the late 90s, there was a girl in the dorm who turned 18. She invited all the freshman girls to her birthday party, which was held in her dorm room. The instructions were to dress up "vixen," and there would be a male stripper. The male stipper turned out to be old and gross. As part of the fun, the male stripper would grope each girl (a kind of party favor if you will). It was a smart kids private college, so these were all studious college girls. Some of them couldn't go through with it, having the guy touch them. Lots of hooting and hollering too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I saw your comment about dressing to get a man at Steve Sailer's place.

    Have you seen 1950s swimsuits v. 1920s swimsuits?

    ReplyDelete
  6. "When I was in college in the late 90s, there was a girl in the dorm who turned 18. She invited all the freshman girls to her birthday party, which was held in her dorm room. The instructions were to dress up "vixen," and there would be a male stripper. The male stipper turned out to be old and gross. As part of the fun, the male stripper would grope each girl (a kind of party favor if you will). It was a smart kids private college, so these were all studious college girls. Some of them couldn't go through with it, having the guy touch them. Lots of hooting and hollering too"

    Were you there? Probably never happened that way... As this blog explains, most young people have become prudes(and "loathsome posers", an apt phrase if I ever heard one).


    -Curtis

    ReplyDelete
  7. I get your point of showing that these things did exist in the 50s, but is there a way that you can quantitatively show that National Enquirer type stuff was a bigger deal in the 50s than the 60s-80s?

    Because it seems like a huge deal in the 60s - 80s as well. It's in loads of movies from then for instance.

    ReplyDelete

You MUST enter a nickname with the "Name/URL" option if you're not signed in. We can't follow who is saying what if everyone is "Anonymous."