The childlike nature of the original lyrics and tune are perfect for the coming-of-age feels that suffuse this inchoate political realignment of ours. Left and right are getting restless, and no longer want to stubbornly stay on their own separate sides of the room during the school dance...
[Tune]
Hey leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Petite leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Will you sub me, Ames?
Do me a fave?
Will you sub me, Ames?
My commie fave
Because I wanna be your groyp fren
Hey leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Petite leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Ooh ooh ooh
Ooh ooh ooh
Ooh ooh ooh
Ooh ooh ooh
Ahhh
Because I wanna be your groyp fren
Hey leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Petite leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Will you sub me, Ames?
Do me a fave?
Will you sub me, Ames?
My commie fave
Because I wanna be your groyp fren
Hey leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Petite leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Hey leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
Petite leftie girl
I wanna be your groyp fren
While the e-girls are tweeting the Oscars, Aimee is off doing something endearingly normie.
ReplyDeleteIt's attractive when a girl doesn't have extensive cultural preferences, but she's curious and fun-loving, so she'd appreciate being introduced to new experiences. To be turned on to something she didn't know she would like, didn't even know existed.
She made this point several times on her old account, about liking when a guy orders for her when they go out (agreeing with Anna Khachiyan). It's part of the fun discovery process to not know everything about everything, and to have someone else guide you through it. At best, you're pleasantly surprised. At worst, there's some novelty value, but more importantly, the emotional validation that someone cares about you enough to want to suggest things that he thinks you might enjoy.
It eliminates having to sift through all the garbage by trial-and-error. She might not mind doing that with social-science texts -- but no one is going to do that degree of sifting in every domain of life. She doesn't want to sift through all the cultural stuff out there, and would prefer having a guide instead.
Most online guys are culture junkies, either in the background or as a main part of their persona. The girls who try to join their online culturally aligned circles, will also be big culture junkies.
They already know 90% of what you know, and that's going to include the mind-blowing stuff -- the remaining 10% is diminishing marginal returns stuff for the nerds. Her eyes aren't going to roll back into her head when you guide her through that final 10%.
Someone like Aimee is more... I can't say virginal, which suggests nervousness and awkwardness... and not beginner / neophyte / etc., which suggests that she wants to become an expert herself (she does not, not in this domain). More eager (from not being experienced), more easily surprised and pleased (she hasn't already had the big experiences in some domain of culture). I don't know if there's a single word for it.
But if you've ever been on the guiding side of that relationship, you know what I mean. It boosts your own confidence, being treated like an expert and shown gratitude for guiding her right to the good stuff so she doesn't have to undertake a 10-year research project to discover it first-hand.
That's why I've never understood the appeal of people dating others who were their identical twin in so many domains of life. That's the joyless form of equality -- being clones who nitpick each other's utterances. You can't nitpick if you're not an expert.
The harmonious form of equality is complementary roles -- one is an expert at this, the other is an expert at that. If you want to find the key anti-woke left theorists and texts, Aimee is the girl to guide you. But she doesn't have a favorite David Lynch movie, a favorite new wave song, or a favorite Spanish cheese. That's where it's your turn to play the guiding role.
E-girls are painting themselves into a courtship corner by having too many cultural experiences on their own (i.e., not guided by some guy).
ReplyDeleteSure, the guy could always have specialized knowledge of mechanical things, but you'd be bored by that and could not share in it -- as appreciative as you might be that his knowledge can fix the sink when it stops working.
Culture is something that overlaps for guys and girls, though. And if you've already got that covered, what does he bring in guide value?
You'd have to hope that it was he who hasn't had any cultural experiences, and who would appreciate being guided through movies, music, and the rest by you.
But I don't think girls understand guys' tastes as well as vice versa -- a culture vulture girl would miss the mark more when recommending things to a culturally normie guy, whereas the culture vulture male would hit the mark more often when taking into account that he's recommending to a girl.
In fact, don't girls usually solicit suggestions from guys rather than their fellow girls, where they're culturally inexperienced? Maybe it's related to guys interacting with strangers better, and girls being more catty toward anyone who isn't living within the same household.
In any case, just some friendly advice to not be such a culture slut if you want a rewarding relationship. Not a normative condemnation, just descriptive.
I'll show you my new wave songs, if you show me your socialist books. Yin / yang.
ReplyDeleteHow are guys and girls supposed to play this game when they both whip out the same organ? Don't date your clone.
AOC's "bf" confirmed for gay. Video:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/whatisleftpod/status/1226711278330101760
Overly resonant buzzing voice, overly sibilant s's, girly uptalk.
I noticed the gay smile awhile back (showing lower row of teeth, dead unwrinkled eye-corners). But wanted to hear his voice before confirming.
Plus -- and girls can correct me here -- he looks plain or ugly, and out of shape. He has no fame or wealth or other status. So how does he punch above his weight with a young attractive exotic woman, who is now very famous and part of the literal ruling class?
Answer: he provided her with something of value, namely bearding for her.
Maybe she could be bearding for him, if he were the wealthy / famous / hot one. But he is not high status in any way, so she wouldn't be signing on to beard for him, but he for her.
She must be either lesbo or bisexual, something I noted way back in September 2018, where she's flagrantly flirting with the babalicious lead singer of Sunflower Bean, Julia Cumming, in a 2017 interview, nearly playing footsy with her out in the open:
http://akinokure.blogspot.com/2018/09/bernie-band-babe-interviewed-ocasio.html
And AOC's brother is a flamer -- usually if one sibling has it, the other is likely to. Since the clear case is the brother, that means AOC has whatever he does but to a lesser extent.
That suggests she's bi, not a lesbian, who show the opposite traits of gays, whereas bisexual girls closely resemble gays (wild child, promiscuous, into drugs, etc.).
But maybe she's one of the rare fun-loving lipstick lesbians -- off-camera, of course. In the public eye, she rapidly turned into a humorless wokescold (2018 seems like an eternity ago for her).
Bloomberg is good: splits the centrist machine vote, especially w/ blacks, whose brokers he's bought off and who have already split in half b/w him and Biden in the national polls. Will take till Super Tuesday to see the full effect, as he's not on the ballot in S.C.
ReplyDeleteWe not only want Bloomberg in the Dem primary, we should have wanted Oprah, Zuck, Elon, Soros, and all the other dipshit billionaires out there who could split up the Establishment vote.
The only one Bernie needed to prevent beforehand, or pummel into submission upon entering the race, was Lyin' Liz Warren, the sole source of bleeding Bernie's yuppie support so that he's only got half the coalition he did in 2016.
"I warned you about Bloomberg"
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1226973849453039617