August 27, 2009

Online newspapers will start charging this fall

This is so fucking sweet. Read my brief write-up at GNXP.

I can just hear the nasally whining from the still-wearing-a-retainer group -- endangering democracy! A reactionary defeat for the internet! (Somehow, I doubt that "saving journalism" will come up.)

These pukes are almost as disgusting as entitled liberals who insist that we get more and more free stuff from the government and yet cry when the state goes broke. Diamond Joe Quimby said it best:

"Are those morons getting dumber or just louder?"

1 comment:

  1. Agnostic,

    They will try it by charging first, and if that fails, they will try this:

    (You really ought read this if you haven't seen it, it glorious)

    Dan Rather wants Obama to help save the news
    by Andrew Travers, Aspen Daily News Staff Writer
    Wednesday, July 29, 2009
    Login or register to post commentsPrinter-friendly version
    Email this Story
    Former CBS News anchor Dan Rather called on President Barack Obama to form a White House commission to help save the press Tuesday night in an impassioned speech at the Aspen Institute.

    “I personally encourage the president to establish a White House commission on public media,” the legendary newsman said.

    Such a commission on media reform, Rather said, ought to make recommendations on saving journalism jobs and creating new business models to keep news organizations alive.

    At stake, he argued, is the very survival of American democracy.

    “A truly free and independent press is the red beating heart of democracy and freedom,” Rather said in an interview yesterday afternoon. “This is not something just for journalists to be concerned about, and the loss of jobs and the loss of newspapers, and the diminution of the American press’ traditional role of being the watchdog on power. This is something every citizen should be concerned about.”

    Rather, who has been a working reporter for more than six decades and currently hosts “Dan Rather Reports” on HDNet, pointed out that there are precedents for such national commissions, which have been used to help other at-risk industries.

    Corporate and political influence on newsrooms, along with the conflation of news and entertainment, has created what Rather called “the dumbing down and sleazing up of what we see on the news.”

    Heather Rousseau/Aspen Daily News
    Dan Rather shares some of his thoughts on the state of public media as he gives a personal interview at the Aspen Meadows on Tuesday before his speech at the Aspen Institute later that evening.
    It has also thinned the amount of investigative and international journalism. The latter loss of correspondents covering America’s two foreign wars, Rather opined, is both a critical detriment to the nation and a disservice to our troops.

    Tears welled in the lifelong reporter’s eyes as he discussed the dwindling number of war correspondents.

    “I feel particularly strong about coverage of the wars,” he said, noting that covering the war in Afghanistan is his top priority on his HDNet program. “No apologies, both as a journalist and as a citizen I just can’t stand to leave those guys out there, fighting, dying, bleeding, getting torn up and say, ‘Look, it’s page 14 news.’ Or ‘Sorry, not on tonight’s newscast.’ It’s an example of the problem, that and not having the watchdogs.”

    The free press, as established by the First Amendment to the Constitution, ought to operate as a public trust, not solely as a money-making endeavor, Rather argued, and it’s time the government make an effort to ensure the survival of the free press. If not the government, he suggested, then an organization like the Carnegie Foundation should take it on. Without action, he predicted, America will lose its independent media.

    “If we do nothing more than stand back and hope that innovation alone will solve this crisis,” he said, “then our best-trained journalists will lose their jobs.”


You MUST enter a nickname with the "Name/URL" option if you're not signed in. We can't follow who is saying what if everyone is "Anonymous."