September 16, 2013

Blonde hair and religious affiliation

In an earlier post on the great civilizational fault-line in Europe, I proposed that one salient marker of the split between Nordo-Balto-Slavic people and Italo-Celto-Germanic people on the other is blonde hair (more prevalent for the Plains People, less for the hilly/mountain people).

One of the main differences emphasized in that post was the strength of religious involvement -- blondes don't seem as into their religion as dark-haired people are. It seems like the blonde parts of Europe have been gradually shifting away from religious engagement since the Lutheran Reformation, with unusually large fractions of those regions being pretty uncommitted nowadays, and not holding things as sacred as they used to. Blondes seem more concretely oriented toward making a living and providing for their nuclear family, devoting less time to broader community involvement in a sacred setting, something that would really bring out the "collective effervescence" in a community.

I'll be looking in finer detail at hair color and religiosity in future posts. For now, let's start with a simpler goal -- how blonde are various religious groups? We should only look at people who come from places where hair color varies enough to have a fair number of blondes. Otherwise we'll be confounding hair color with ethnicity -- dark-haired Italians vs. blonde Swedes, for example. We want to look only at hair color, so I'm restricting the data to white Americans of English and German descent. That will also include all the major religious groupings. (I'm excluding Jews because they're not who I mean by English and German, even if they came here from there.)

The sample is the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (1979), a nationally representative group who were born in from the late '50s through the mid '60s, and who began to be studied in the late '70s, with regular follow-up surveys being done throughout their lives.

At the outset they were asked what religion they were raised in, and a little later they were categorized by hair color. I've merged "light blonde" and "blonde" into a single "blonde" group, and "dark brown" and "black" into a single "dark" group. The extremes are quite small in number, and it's not clear how meaningful the distinction was in the interviewer's mind. They were probed for clarification if they said they were raised Protestant -- e.g., Methodist, Lutheran, etc. The category here labeled "Protestant" is a catch-all for anyone not in the major denominations. I'm assuming most of them are evangelical, charismatic, and so on. "Other" I guess could mean Orthodox, Hindu, Buddhist, or whatever else parents might have been raising their kids as during the '60s and '70s.

Here is the percent of each group that has blonde hair:


The Episcopalians are more than twice as blonde as the catch-all Protestants. Lutherans are also noticeably blonder than the others. As are those children raised as godless heathens. If blonde birds of a feather flock together, this confirms the hunch that Episcopalians are the closest to atheists among mainstream groups. But it also hints at a similar streak among Lutherans, who most readers probably don't have much of a clear idea about.

We can see that it's not Protestantism per se because the catch-alls are the least blonde, with Methodists and Presbyterians being pretty dark as well. Catholics and Baptists are equally blonde.

Rather, it seems like the more historically high-commitment groups are darker haired, while the less involved and lenient groups are much blonder. Catholicism is already fairly high in commitment; the historically radical groups were even more so. One of Luther's main reforms was to shift focus away from performing acts of penance to atone for your sins, and toward faith alone as the path toward salvation. And the lax nature of Episcopalian doctrine and practice (at least by the late 1970s) is a widespread stereotype.

Is this something about non-dark hair? Nope. The table below shows blondes, darks, and redheads (light browns are the remainder, not shown). Most redheaded is at the top.

Blonde Dark Red
Presbyterian 17.1 60.6 6.9
Baptist 19 57.4 4.6
Methodist 18 55.2 4.1
Lutheran 24.9 51.5 3.5
Protestant 14.2 61.8 3.3
Catholic 19.1 58.1 3.2
Episcopalian 29.5 52.4 2.9
None 27.6 51.9 2.6
Other 19.5 57.8 1.9

Redheads are the least common in godless, Other, and Episcopalian groups, but most common in Methodist, Baptist, and Presbyterian groups. Folks raised Presbyterian are nearly 3 times as redheaded as those raised with no religion. The general trend is for higher-commitment and radical groups to have more gingers. That fits the stereotype of fiery redheads, from Tacitus' description of the Germanic tribes of the ancient world, to the medieval Vikings, to present-day Yosemite Sam. In case we weren't sure before, now we know that red hair cannot be meaningfully grouped with blonde hair  ("light hair") when it comes to social and cultural traits.

Remember that all these people are whites of English or German origin. Dark-haired French and blonde Lithuanians are not mixing up the results by introducing ethnicity as a confound. It does seem like there are two populations being studied, but it's hair color rather than ethnicity or nationality that distinguishes them. When the genetic mutations for blonde hair first appeared, they must have been doing something, and now it looks like a retreat from religious involvement is a key part of that new variety of homo sapiens. That really would have been a novel character trait, given how ubiquitous religion has been across the world throughout human evolution.

In future posts, we'll take a look at other hints from the NLSY that blonde hair color marked the beginning of the slow secularization of the groups that it caught on in.

NLSY variables: R00096.00 (ethnic origin), R02147.00 (race), R17741.00 (hair color), R00103.00 (religion raised in)

15 comments:

  1. So, are blonds gayer than their darker haired countrymen?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haha, I don't think the NLSY asks about the sex of your sex partners, but I've only just begun to look through their variables...

    ReplyDelete
  3. "When the genetic mutations for blonde hair first appeared, they must have been doing something"

    Neoteny? Are there similar correlations with adult epicanthic folds? Lactose tolerance? Though I really doubt NLSY asks about those.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting.

    However, one key problem is that stated ethnicity doesn't mean much in America. How English or German were those "English" and "Germans"?

    It's quite likely those in the less blond categories are considerably more mixed with other groups, such as Celtic or Italian.

    If possible, I would suggest running a similar analysis for people from England or Germany.

    As for this:

    "One of the main differences emphasized in that post was the strength of religious involvement -- blondes don't seem as into their religion as dark-haired people are. It seems like the blonde parts of Europe have been gradually shifting away from religious engagement since the Lutheran Reformation, with unusually large fractions of those regions being pretty uncommitted nowadays, and not holding things as sacred as they used to. Blondes seem more concretely oriented toward making a living and providing for their nuclear family, devoting less time to broader community involvement in a sacred setting, something that would really bring out the 'collective effervescence' in a community."

    This is one of those "correlation vs causation" things. I'd argue that hair color has nothing to do with anything – it's just that Northern Europeans in general (and, for that matter, all higher average IQ peoples) are less religious over all.

    And, of course, the nuclear family/community centric thing likely has something to do with the historic mating patterns in Europe:

    How Inbred are Europeans? | JayMan's Blog

    ReplyDelete
  5. Quite a few men (including me and Vincent Van Gogh) have blond head-hair but red facial hair. I wonder if they tend to be more like blonds or more like redheads.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is one of those "correlation vs causation" things. I'd argue that hair color has nothing to do with anything – it's just that Northern Europeans in general (and, for that matter, all higher average IQ peoples) are less religious over all

    Yes, personal commitment variables of children based on hair color net of the religion they are in would be more of a good test.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Interesting. Is this because of the sub-groups blondes are likely to be descended from, or do you think there's pleiotropy?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "It's quite likely those in the less blond categories are considerably more mixed with other groups, such as Celtic or Italian."

    Sure, but that's possible in England and Germany too. The NLSY offers the option of Irish, Scottish, and Italian for main ethnicity you identify with.

    "Yes, personal commitment variables of children based on hair color net of the religion they are in would be more of a good test."

    I've got those data too. But we don't have to look only at the commitment level "net of the religion they are in" -- that makes their current religion sound like an accident.

    Blonde people have historically sorted themselves into those religious groups that require lower commitment, while high-commitment groups have attracted proportionately fewer blondes and more dark-and-red-haired folks. So that's an effect of hair color on religious commitment right there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Being Catholic in England (if you're not Irish) is a high-committment thing, as it is in Northern Germany. Southern Germans (and Austrians, who might respond "German" on an ethnicity survey) default to Catholic, so that's not an indicator, for them, of high religious commitment - people from Catholic countries are not known for strong religiosity.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Commitment" is relative, not absolute. Catholicism's practices require more from its adherents than Lutheranism does.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm in an evil mood. How many blonde Jews were there?

    ReplyDelete
  12. 3.5% of Jews were blonde (n = 86, so there could be some slight sample error).

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yeah, it sounds like this could be an artifact of phenotypic clines within the UK and Germany. Which doesn't necessarily disprove your thesis, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Color me (no pun intended of course) a blonde Lutheran with German and Finnish blood.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Perhaps it's a learned behaviour??
    As blondes have we ever had to invest in much.. mating as a priority?
    Nope.. Blondes were competed for, didn't have to lift a finger... even the men had women swarming them, hahahaha XD

    ReplyDelete

You MUST enter a nickname with the "Name/URL" option if you're not signed in. We can't follow who is saying what if everyone is "Anonymous."