The Spearman rank correlation is +0.72, p less than 10^-6. He later showed that greater ethnic diversity predicted lower trust in neighborhoods, so he surely noticed this pattern earlier. I haven't read the book, so it may even be in there.
February 4, 2009
Whiteness of states and their social capital
This is probably like a Pythagorean Theorem of sociology, so I don't claim the finding is original. Robert Putnam's Bowling Alone website has lots of free data, and at the bottom is a list of states and their social capital indexes -- basically, how socially cohesive communities are in that state. It jumps out at you, but here's a scatter-plot just to convince you:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a93be/a93bef67a2dacac04a3f6abd2c6d57d25ae72e1b" alt=""
The Spearman rank correlation is +0.72, p less than 10^-6. He later showed that greater ethnic diversity predicted lower trust in neighborhoods, so he surely noticed this pattern earlier. I haven't read the book, so it may even be in there.
The Spearman rank correlation is +0.72, p less than 10^-6. He later showed that greater ethnic diversity predicted lower trust in neighborhoods, so he surely noticed this pattern earlier. I haven't read the book, so it may even be in there.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The white percent axis only goes down to 60. What about California, New Mexico, Hawaii, and Texas? Aren't they all less than 50% white?
ReplyDeleteI have an old Putnam post here.
ReplyDeleteNo, they're what is shown. I should add that Putnam left out Alaska and Hawaii, and I left out DC, not being a state.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Though the plot is also consistent with the possibility that a small fraction of minorities has no harmful effect; the tipping point in that case seems to be somewhere around 90%.
ReplyDelete